| Definition of a SucculentMark Dimmitt, Director of Natural HistoryArizona-Sonora Desert Museum
 Classifying plants as succulent or nonsucculent is problematic. Regional floras
  and popular books on succulents are all vague at defining what makes a plant
  a succulent. For example, Rowley (1978) concluded only that many plants are difficult
  to categorize as to succulence. Popular publications on succulents often ignore
  clearly succulent plants such as many orchids and bromeliads simply because most
  succulent collectors don't grow them (e.g., Eggli 2001). Plant physiologists
  and systematists tend to be similarly noncommittal. Some authors use the term
  semisucculent for those plants with less obvious succulent characteristics, but
  this still leaves the separation between semisucculent and nonsucculent undefined.	
 Von Willert et al. (1992) represents the only source we know of that attempts
  a concise description. They define a succulent as any plant that possesses a
  succulent tissue, and further specified a succulent tissue as "... a living tissue
  that... serves and guarantees a ...temporary storage of utilizable water, which
  makes the plant... temporarily independent from external water supply...". The
  authors recognized a subcategory of xerophytic succulents, which excludes halophytic
  succulents (salt-tolerant plants that often grow in saline wetlands) and most
  geophytes (plants with their perennating organs below ground, e.g., potato, Jatropha
  macrorhiza, and most plants that are colloquially called "bulbs" in
  horticulture).
 
 Examples of bulbous geophytes. 
          (The Freesia is technically a corm; the others are true bulbs.) The fleshy parts of most "bulbs" 
          serve more for food storage than water storage; they produce above-ground 
          growth only after the soil is moistened. However, some bulbous geophytes 
          sprout before the beginning of the rainy season or maintain green foliage 
          well into the dry season; we would classify these as succulents. The 
          succulent tissues of halophytes and of most geophytes serve functions 
          other than to support growth when soil moisture is unavailable. This 
          definition of the term xerophytic succulent still leaves the status 
          of a number of plants in question. 
 Some questionably succulent species
 (click on images for additional information and more photos)
                   
          We classify all of the above except Psittacanthus as succulents;
this parasite is rather fleshy, but it has a dependable supply of water as long
as its host is alive. 
            | 
 matacandelilla, giant 
                cane milkweedAsclepias albicans
 | 
 tescalama, rock figFicus palmeri
 |   
            | 
 torote prietoBursera hindsiana
 
 | 
 ocotillo machoFouquieria macdougalii
 |   
            | 
 calabacilla, coyote 
                gourdsCucurbita spp.
 | 
 matacoraJatropha cuneata
 
 |   
            | 
 ligaEuphorbia xantii
 | 
 mistletoePsittacanthus sonorae
 |  
 Calabacilla and many other cucurbits have large tuberous roots that have 
        considerable moisture as well as copious starch reserves. A sample of 
        Cucurbita foetidissima root was 81% water. They produce leafy shoots, 
        flowers, and fruits well in advance of seasonal rains. This trait is itself 
        insufficient to separate calabacilla from clearly nonsucculent plants 
        such as manzanita (Arctostaphylos spp.), which sprout from woody 
        crowns immediately after dry-season fires. Metabolizing stored starch 
        in manzanita crowns and roots generates enough water to support growth 
        in the fall before the winter rains begin. Though tuberous-rooted cucurbits 
        may also produce some of their water from starch breakdown, the high free 
        water content along with their ability to produce growth even after a 
        year without rain leads us to classify them as xerophytic root succulents.
 
            
  |  |  |  
            | Cucurbita foetidissima root 
              with section cut out to show succulent tissue | Manzanita (Arctostaphylos sp.) 
              sprouting from the root crown 2 months after a fire |  The growthform of tescalama (desert rock fig, Ficus petiolaris palmeri) is intermediate 
          between a woody tree and a stem succulent. The fact that seedlings can 
          establish on exposed rock faces (saxicole) in the desert indicates that 
          this species has adaptations that typical woody trees lack. The caudex 
          of a young tescalama contained 68% water, somewhat more than stems of nonsucculent 
          trees such as foothill palo verde (Parkinsonia microphylla, 53% 
          water). Tescalama does not appear to have CAM. We tentatively classify 
          it as a succulent based on its marginally elevated water content and 
          lifestyle. (A closely related species, F. petiolaris petiolaris, occurs 
          in tropical deciduous forest, a community comprised of so many similarly 
          semisucculent trees of numerous species that the forest cannot support 
          a fire.)
 
            
          
  
  |  |  |  |  
            | Ficus palmeri (rock fig), in cultivation | Parkinsonia microphylla (foothill palo 
              verde) | Ficus petiolaris (rock fig) |  Most species of Fouquieria exhibit a woody 
          shrub growthform, albeit a strange one. But they have a clearly succulent lifestyle: very 
          shallow roots and the capacity to produce functioning leaves within 
          2 days after a light rainfall (ca. 7 mm). The thin subcutaneous layer 
          of moist tissue in these plants is succulent in nature (Henrickson, 
          1969a and b, 1972). The rapid leaf production indicates the presence 
          of an undescribed non-CAM idling metabolism (Dimmitt 
          2000). 
         
            
  |  |  |  |  
  | Fouquieria on a sand dune with shallow roots exposed by 
                wind erosion | Fouquieria leaves, 2 days after a rain | The broken spine reveals a subcutaneous layer of moist 
                tissue  |   REFERENCES
 Dimmitt, Mark A. 2000.  Flowering plants of the Sonoran Desert.  In: Phillips,
  Steven J. & Patricia W. Comus (eds.).  A Natural History
  of the Sonoran Desert.
   University of California Press.
 
 Eggli, U. (ed.)  2001. Illustrated Handbook of Succulent Plants: Monocotyledons.
  Springer.
 
 Henrickson, J. 1969a. An introduction to the Fouquieriaceae. Cactus and Succulent
  Journal (U.S.) 41:97-106.
 
 Henrickson, J. 1969b. The succulent Fouquierias. Cactus and Succulent Journal
  (U.S.) 41:178-184.
 
 Henrickson, J. 1972. A taxonomic revision of the Fouquieriaceae. Aliso 7:439-537.
 
 Rowley, G. 1978. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Succulents. Leisure Books (publ.
  by Salamander Books Ltd.).
 
 Von Willert, D. J., B. M. Eller, M. J. A. Werger, E. Brinckmann, and H.-D. Ihlenfeldt.
  1992. Life Strategies of Succulents in Deserts with Special Reference to the
  Namib Desert. Cambridge University Press, London.
   |